I have decided to start a new feature on the blog called "Tadpole Tales" to review children's books. For an adult, I have always had an unnatural love of kiddie lit and I often find myself thinking about the books I buy for the girls more than the ones I buy for myself.
In fact, since I started having children, my main source of for-pleasure reading has been the "young adult" section of the bookstore. I think there are a couple of reasons for that. After a long day of mental and physical calisthenics with the children, I find I don't have the intellect for a really deep, literary read. The sort of books I used to seek out are now capable of putting me right to sleep (often in the bathtub...dangerous sport, that). Also, I think that "young adult" books typically deal with more fanciful topics that are easier to lose myself in than murder mysteries or chick lit. I get enough real life from sunrise to sundown, thanks.
Picture/story books for the kids are a real source of joy for me. I almost hate to admit it but when Claire brings a Scholastic book order form home, my heart gives a little pitter-pat. I have learned a few things about kiddie lit in the last year or two that make me want to start this little feature on the blog.
I do not find it as easy to find a review of a children's book as it is to find one for an adult book and when I do find reviews, they often don't have the sort of information I'm looking for. I think I'm frequently looking for more parent-friendly information than a lot of reviews give. For example, I honestly like to know approximately how long it takes to read a book to the girls. Some days we are more up for a lengthy tale than others. Also, I like to think about the language and actions of the characters in the books I expose the kids to. I'm not a prude but I really object to having to expose my kids to characters who are disrespectful or use language I don't approve of (unless the story is about how rude those things are). I like to know how engaged the kids are in it, what they think of the illustrations, if they ask for it to be read again and again or if it is forgotten forever after the first read, things like that. My girls are quite vocal about their opinions of the books we read and they each have different things to say so I'm going to give it a go (once the boy gets big enough we'll really have all the bases covered).
I think a lot of our opinions are worth sharing and I hope the reviews are useful for anyone who has kids to read to. At the same time, I'm happy to just make logs of what we read for my own use to guide me in future purchases for our family and friends. You can let me know what you think.
My first review will be of two books retold and illustrated by
James Marshall (1942-1992), Red Riding Hood and Goldilocks and the Three Bears:
Red Riding HoodWritten by: James Marshall
Illustrated by: James Marshall
Published by: Scholastic Inc.
ISBN: 0-590-44991-5
First Published : 1987
Approximate reading time*: 5 minutes
This is the classic Red Riding Hood story, just with more engaging language and cute illustrations. I'm really tired of what I call "Once upon a time" stories. Those are the ones that are told with a lot of factual language, no emotion, very proper words and, frankly, bored kids. For example, in a lot of fairy tales the big bad wolf, when asked to identify himself by Grandma usually says something like "It is me Granny, Red Riding Hood". James Marshall's version is much better. In this story he says "It is I, your delicious---er---darling granddaughter". Honestly, you can just feel the dastardly oozing out of that guy.
The story encourages readers not to speak to strangers and I think my kids really got the point. Between Red's mother's warning, the spooky atmosphere, her absolutely naive reaction to things, that sneaky wolf and the gobbling of Grandma and Red alike, the girls couldn't help but see the lesson. However, even after all of that, James Marshall included a final page of the story that is funny and brilliant and gives the lesson one last hit home. The final line on the next to last page reads "Red Riding Hood promised never,
ever to speak to another stranger, charming manners or not". The final page has the text "and she never did" complete with an illustration of a demure looking crocodile holding a cane and a straw boater with Red walking away looking irritated, arms outstretched in a "talk to the hand" sort of way. Genius.
My only concern with this book was that the wolf does actually eat Grandma and Red Riding Hood. A hunter then comes and kills the wolf and slices him open to release his captives. I wondered how Claire would take the idea of the wolf being killed and then sliced open but she did not really seem bothered. The tale is fantastical enough that the idea of the wolf meeting a violent end does not seem to register. After all, they both emerge completely unscathed with the Grandmother complaining about how there was not enough light to read inside the wolf. All you see of the wolf after his demise is his feet, barely in the picture while Red looks on with a bewildered expression. Honestly, I prefer this more traditional version to ones I have read in which the wolf locks Granny in the closet. Seriously...how scary is a wolf who ties an old lady up in hopes of scoring a picnic basket full of goodies rather than a guy who is desperate to devour child and grandmother both? In my opinion, being scared for a character's life is much more meaningful than being scared for her chocolate cake.
The girls both really like this book and have asked for it a few times. They love the pictures and like to point out little details that they see. They love the final page and we have had a few stranger awareness chats since we added this title to our lineup. I like a book that can help segue to an important discussion topic like that.
Goldilocks and the Three BearsWritten by: James Marshall
Illustrated by: James Marshall
Published by: Scholastic Inc.
ISBN: 0-590-44992-3
First Published : 1988
Approximate reading time*: 5 minutes
I don't know about you, but I never really understood the point of the Goldilocks story. Girl wanders into strange house, debates with herself about the attributes of different objects, falls asleep, gets scared away, the end. Then, I read this version of the story and suddenly Goldilocks and the Three Bears is a magnificent, relevant tale that I feel I
need to read to my children.
The difference, I learned, is in the development of the Goldilocks character. In another version of the tale that we have in the house, Goldilocks wanders into the woods by herself and happens upon the bears' cottage. Her personality isn't described and the closest thing to a lesson that I can glean from the story is that wandering off is not wise (a great lesson but better illustrated in other texts).
In this version, James Marshall took it one step further. He has made Golidlocks into a nasty, disobedient child who does exactly as she pleases. The very first page shows Goldilocks, wicked experession on her face, jumping from a swing with intentions of landing into a tub of water to soak a group of slumbering cats. All this happens while a person on the other side of the fence tells her friend that Goldilocks is not the sweet kid she appears to be. Throughout the story, as Goldilocks enters the bears house and disrespects everything they own she occasionally says "Don't mind if I do!" and leaves the place in quite a shambles. By the time the bears arrive home and scare Goldilocks we, as readers, are hoping those bears really teach her a lesson.
This book enabled me to begin a whole conversation with my kids about respecting other people's property, asking for permission before touching things that aren't ours, and how a little curiousity is a lovely thing but it can go too far. This is a very timely tale considering how my kids have been caught over the last few months doing things like scibbling on the cut edge of a novel, climbing on toys/furniture that have no business being climbed upon or riding an Ott light like a horse and breaking it.
I think the girls really like the detailed, cartoonish illustrations in these books quite a bit. James Marshall has a way of drawing facial expressions that enable us to infer the character's feelings from one page to the next. Characters who are drawn with more wooden expressions never seem to get the same reaction from the kids. Besides, some of the details are fun. For example, Red Riding Hood's house is full of cats. It's funny and it's cute and we have some fun sizing them up from time to time. Unlike some other books we have, I do not mind reading these. They are engaging, fun and a good length for bedtime when, honestly, I am sometimes ready to curl up in a chair by the fire and think about nothing for a while.
* For the reading time I time how long it takes me to read the book aloud, at a child-friendly speed with any necessary inflections. I also include the time that creeps into the readings because of the inevitable questions the kids ask or comments they make. I won't enter into full discussions during the reading of the book but I will respond to little comments or queries "Look Mommy! She has pretty shoes on" or "What's custard?". Discussion topics like "Why did Red Riding Hood's mommy let her into the woods alone in the first place?" I tell them we'll discuss at the end of the story.